All Talk and No Action? - New York Fashion Week

-

This week, my Instagram feed was flooded with posts from New York Fashion Week 2022. For celebrities who are eager to seek out the latest trends and designers who want to showcase their creations, this semi-annual event was a highly anticipated one. Amidst this, I couldn't help but think about how designer pieces are often only worn once by a celebrity, in fear of being seen repeating their outfits. However, most designer brands are reportedly committing to reducing their carbon emissions. In 2020, fashion designer Gabriela Hearst held the first-ever Carbon Neutral Fashion Show during NYFW, which saw other renowned brands such as Gucci and Burberry joining in (Paton, 2021). Eco-conscious fashion is also increasingly being featured in the runways. So, what is the problem? 
Statement on a commitment to carbon neutrality on the official Gabriela Hearst website. 
Source: Gabrielahearst.com

While researching on issues of sustainability of NYFW, I came across this 'Executive Summary' by the Council of Fashion Designers America (CFDA) and Boston Consulting Group reviewing the environmental sustainability of the event and which provides guidelines for brands to follow. According to their analyses, NYFW contributes a significant amount (48,000 metric tonnes) of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. This was derived from their assumptions that 10,000 patrons had travelled by plane to get to this destination. Indeed, this is where the problem lies. The NYFW itself is an in-situ event that would not be the same were it held anywhere else. They also remarked that the pandemic resulted in a compromise between the economy (or profits) and the environment, where some designers could not meet the sustainability requirements due to budget constraints. Alongside this, they listed some measures they would take to ensure that businesses shift to more eco-friendly practices. 

However, I remain largely sceptical of their ability to corroborate the brands and enforce sustainable fashion practices. Firstly, the CFDA's calculations for carbon emissions were only taking into account air travel, and excluded other carbon-generating sources following the increased activity due to NYFW. Furthermore, this paper by Boykoff, et al. (2021) reviews the impacts of the fashion industry and reveals that the production processes themselves are the most problematic, especially when labour is outsourced to the Global South. For example, textile production requires a large amount of water (200 tons per 1 ton of cotton), and petrochemicals (microplastics) used pollute water bodies (Boykoff, et al. 2021). Transportation of these raw materials from the supplying countries to the Global North where demand is centred also contributes significantly to the carbon footprint. Thus, there are many aspects to tackle, and different designers have varying methods of producing their garments, so the corroboration and assurance of eco-conscious fashion would be an arduous task. Regardless, the issue of pollution from fashion is relatively under-addressed, and I feel that the NYFW is a good platform to begin raising awareness. 


Impact of garment manufacturing chain. 

References: 

Boykoff, M., Chandler, P., Church, P. and Osnes, B. (2021).Examining climate change and sustainable/fast fashion in the 21st century: ‘Trash the Runway’, Oxford Open Climate Change, Volume 1, Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfclm/kgab003

Gabriela Hearst. (n.d.). Carbon Neutral Show. https://www.gabrielahearst.com/blogs/stories/carbon-neutral-show

Paton, E. (2021, November 17). Figuring Out Fashion Week’s Carbon Problem. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/12/fashion/figuring-out-fashion-weeks-carbon-problem.html

The Council of Fashion Designers America. (2020). Sustainability by Design: Rethinking New York Fashion Week. CFDA. https://s3.amazonaws.com/cfda.f.mrhenry.be/2020/10/Executive-SummaryFINAL-10.7.20.pdf

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An Environmentally Unfriendly Start

-
Image
 3... 2... 1... HAPPY NEW YEAR!  As people all around the world gathered to witness the display of fireworks, I couldn't help but think about how many more New Years we can experience on Earth. This year, the fireworks in Singapore were held around neighbourhoods to manage crowd control, although not all went as planned. An incident of a firework projectile hitting a nearby house resulted in a halt in the fireworks display, and concerns were raised regarding the safety of fireworks. However, how harmful are fireworks really?  Source: Channel News Asia. (2022). https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/hdb-block-hit-fireworks-projectile-ubi-new-year-2410346 Air Pollution from Fireworks  While decorative, fireworks are a rather potent source of air pollution, releasing PM10 and PM2.5 particles into the atmosphere. These particles are largely detrimental to one's health even when one is exposed to them in a short period of time, and are commonly associated with cardiovascular and
Read more

Festivals - Holi

-
Image
Holi 2022 celebration in India.  Source: National Today Holi, also known as the Festival of Colours, is a religious Spring festival celebrated by Hindus. This year, Holi falls on the 18th of March. Although celebrated a little differently according to cultural practices, the more common ways of celebrating are by lighting bonfires and throwing water and powder paints of various colours to commemorate love, spring and new life (BBC, 2022). Holi is also celebrated in Singapore, and the biggest scale event is organised by Rang De Holi every year, where people get to throw rainbow-coloured powders in an open field. But this event is celebrated on an even larger scale in India and Nepal due to its historical and cultural significance. As with all events and festivities however, this celebration has also drawn the attention of environmentalists for its toxic effects on humans and ecosystems. Taking a look at a research paper by Gardner and Lal (2012), the impacts of Holi celebrations are fou
Read more

Impacts of Nuclear Weapons Tests

-
Image
A test-firing of a missile in North Korea in January 2022. Source: REUTERS Last week, the North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un guided the testing of the Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) Hwasong-17. This launch reportedly flew higher and for a longer time than previous missile tests, landed in Japan's Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) and was largely condemned by the G7 leaders, including U.S. President Joe Biden and Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, during their summit on 24th March (Smith & Shin, 2022). While this is devastating news, nuclear weapons testing is by no means unfamiliar to us. We can already expect some level of consequences to either the environment or humankind. The United Nations terms nuclear testing as the 'cruellest' environmental injustice due to its many lasting effects including radioactive nuclear waste causing lethal health impacts (United Nations, 2020).  Specific to North Korea, their missile testings have already significantly impacted
Read more